One Heart Family Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 050533141
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3142506983
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adoption
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $302,262
- Expenses
- $279,793
- Assets
- $542,996
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jeff Adams (President)
People named in this filing
- Jeff Adams (President)
- Kayla Wagner (Treasurer)
- Ev Reith (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
One Heart cares for children in the Missouri foster care system by equipping and supporting Christian families impacted by foster care.
What it reported doing in 2025
During 2025, One Heart Family Ministries assisted in training 22 new foster families who completed the state required MO C.A.R.E. classes, bringing total trained families to 572. One Heart families adopted 18 children from state foster care, bringing the total number of children adopted into One Heart families to 390. One Heart also provided support to children in distributing 150 school backpacks, Christmas gifts to 334 children, and 426 children served at the foster closets in 2025. An additional 11 families also received scholarships for counseling services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 51
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $235K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.