One Global Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923079244
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Duluth, GA, USA
Phone
3107076456
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,877
Expenses
$199,613
Assets
$30,939

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHADWICK MOHAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • NICOLE PETERS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN WESLEY (TREASURER)
  • CHADWICK MOHAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • NICOLE PETERS (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

One Global Network, Inc. mission is to train church planters and equip them in planting, establishing and multiplying churches. One Global Network, Inc. also comes along side other churches and church networks to resource and guide their leaders and communities towards further establishment and strategic expansion.

What it reported doing in 2025

The leadership of One Global met with and helped equip the following churches: Life Fellowship Church Dallas, Indian Diaspora church community in Dallas, Asian IndianChristian Community in New Jersey, Harvest Church in Scarborough Ontario Canada, New Beginning Fellowship in Atlanta, Calvary Church in Greensboro North Carolina, Global Revival Harvest Center Cary, North Carolina, New Life Church in Leominster, Massachusetts, Elevated Life Church in Whipeney, New Jersey

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.4%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 21.4%; rating input score 21

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 59% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.4% of revenue deployed · 21.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.