One Gift Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208992710
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Morristown, NJ, USA
Phone
9739840990
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,322
Expenses
$339,565
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNE DELANEY (PRESIDENT)
  • LEIGH PORGES (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TERRY PARISE (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $16,269 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

One gift inc. Is a unique wish-fulfillment program for adults with cancer. The volunteer, nonprofit organization was founded in 1988 by leigh s. Porges and anne delaney and is dedicated to the memory of their mothers, carol g. Simon and ruth ann delaney.one gift inc. Serves adult cancer patients at the following locations: clara maass medical centermorristown memorial hospitalnewark beth israel medical centeroverlook hospitalsaint barnabas medical center in livingstonsomerset medical centertrinitas regional medical centerdedicated volunteers at each of these hospitals encourage positive thinking and help adult cancer patients focus their energy on fighting the disease and getting better. Our volunteers help one gift inc. Work closely with patients, families, and friends to create a memorable experience for those who could not otherwise afford it.

What it reported doing in 2015

Wish program - to alleviate the stress and anxiety that a diagnosis of cancer can bring to a patient and their family by providing a joyful experience or memorable occasion that individuals with cancer may enjoy and cherish.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -786.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.6% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $326K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $16K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.