One Cumberland Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883245239
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 0000000000
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $138,112
- Expenses
- $7,781
- Assets
- $270,907
- Liabilities
- $42,500
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kim Menefee (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Kim Menefee (Executive Director)
- Rob Garcia (Board Chair)
- Melissa Cantrell (Vice Chair)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To protect and conserve the natural resources of the Cumberland area while enhancing its identity as a vibrant diverse community Through initiatives that promote environmental stewardship cultural enrichment and improved public access the organization supports projects that elevate quality of life and foster community engagement
What it reported doing in 2024
Environmental Stewardship In partnership with the National Park Service Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area and the Cumberland Community Improvement District One Cumberland is actively supporting structural and environmental improvements to the Paces Mill unit These enhancements benefit approximately 270000 annual visitors by improving access to natural resources long-term sustainability of a regional asset and promoting conservation
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 94.4%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 34.82; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 40.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 79.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.