One CommunityUSA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474896404
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- (214) 851-4872
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $230,403
- Expenses
- $446,733
- Assets
- $33,424
- Liabilities
- $2,100
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ian Feuer (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Ian Feuer (President & CEO): $19,888 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
One CommunityUSA stands as a bridge — connecting people, restoring hope, and rebuilding trust across neighborhoods and systems that have historically been fractured.
What it reported doing in 2024
One CommunityUSAs evidence-based programs are a catalyst for positive change in the underserved and underrepresented communities. Programs address: Reentry, Diversion, Restorative Justice and Mentoring for Veterans and Civilian Offenders; PreVocational and WorkForce Readiness; Vocational, Leadership and Career Development; and Community Engagement Crime Reduction Initiatives that bring minority owned businesses, their customers, area youth and law enforcement together to discuss and resolve contemporary social issues with special empathizes on education, mental health, inclusion, racial diversity and improving community-police relations.During the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, One CommunityUSA also provided in-kind services in the amount of $293,861 and had in-kind rent in the amount of $43,464. These in-kind amounts are included as in-kind revenue and in-kind expense on the financial statements of the organization. One CommunityUSA relies on volunteer contributed services for operations and administration. The Organization estimates the volunteer hours during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 to be approximately 624 for board members. Using the Independent Sector's value of a volunteer hour, these contributed services are valued at $20,898.Other than in this Schedule O of the Form 990, the value of the in-kind donations and volunteer time are not reflected in this Form 990.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $83.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -93.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $379K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.