One Colorado Education Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271333378
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3033966170
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Lesbian, Gay Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,624,438
- Expenses
- $1,844,120
- Assets
- $1,241,721
- Liabilities
- $361,128
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- NADINE BRIDGES (EXECUTIVE DI): $152,724 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
One Colorado education fund (ocef) is committed to securing and protecting equality and opportunity for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (lgbt) coloradans and their families.
What it reported doing in 2024
One Colorado (ocef) was alerted to a change in children's hospital Colorado's internal gender affirming care policies, preventing young adults from receiving medical care. In response, ocef engaged in advocacy efforts, and coalition building with elected officials, community members, providers, and stakeholders, resulting in a letter requesting a change in policy and public accountability. A public letter, signed by nearly 1000 individuals, including elected officials and stakeholders, was sent expressing their concerns. Children's hospital expressed its commitment to expanding gender-affirming care services through the true clinic and participating in ongoing discussions with ocef's provider coalition. In 5 weeks, ocef visited 14 cities: Colorado springs, fort collins, salida, gunnison, montrose, grand junction, glenwood springs, edwards, pueblo, boulder, longmont, greeley, aurora, and denver during a statewide tour. Ocef engaged with community members across the state and provided lgbtq+ coloradans and their families education regarding the risk to marriage equality in the state of Colorado and to learn from community regarding concerns about the increased anti-lgbtq+ attacks, especially on the transgender community. Following the scotus decision in 303 creative llc vs elenis which ruled that artistic expression is protected speech under the first amendment, ocef hosted a joint press conference with ag weiser at the carr judicial building; which included faith leaders, business leader, community stakeholders, elected officials, an over 50 local and national press members. Ocef health equity team worked in partnership with the Colorado department of health care policy & financing to align medicaid policy with current wpath best practices in gender-affirming healthcare to reduce barriers in accessing care. The Colorado department of public health and environment's health equity commission approved the ocef's health equity team recommended sogi data set to implement in public health systems across the state of Colorado. Ocef collaborated with local stakeholder to produce a voter guide and gotv campaign on educating community in advocating for pro-justice/pro-equality school board candidates. Ocef youth and schools program hosted their in-person queer youth summit. Ocef attended over 25 prides throughout Colorado. Ocef staff and board finalized the strategic plan which was introduced in 2022 and began implementing the goals and objectives of the strategic plan in 2023. Ocef finished a rebranding process and launched a new website.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 74.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $153K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.