On the Waterfront Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363318285
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Rockford, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8159644388
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,194,530
- Expenses
- $1,284,247
- Assets
- $177,034
- Liabilities
- $399,498
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
On the waterfront, inc. Is a nonprofit organization established to promote community advancement through celebration and to support not-for-profit organizations, primarily by producing festivals and events.
What it reported doing in 2010
On the waterfront, inc. Is established to promote community advancement through celebration and to support local not-for-profit entities and businesses and enhance the image of the community, primarily by producing a quality regional street festival. Food booths for the festival, as well as the operation of beverage, button & ticket booths, are operated primarily by organizations that are charitable, educational or otherwise not-for-proft in nature. Since 1986, on the waterfront has provided these fundraising opportunities for present and past not-for-profit partners that have generated over 9 million in revenue for their causes. These revenues are redirected back into the community for much-needed services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.26; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $951K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 8 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.