On the Commons
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481271532
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6124141593
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,132
- Expenses
- $351,771
- Assets
- $112,060
- Liabilities
- $1,667
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HARRIET BARLOW (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE RISTAU (CO-DIRECTOR): $30,647 total reported compensation
- ANA MICKA (CO-DIRECTOR): $30,647 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
On the commons is a commons movement strategy center. Our purpose is to foster a new worldview, set of practices and solutions that promote the emergence of a commons-based society.its work takes many forms ranging from introducing practical political and economic policies to advancing popular education campaigns, community arts projects and grassroots local action. The organization focuses on a breadth of issues which reach deep into the realms of culture, ecology, technology, economics, politics, human relationships and social systems.
What it reported doing in 2014
Organization's highlights 1) building and bringing visibility to the commons movement.our times call for a renewal of values such as sharing, cooperation and reciprocity that had served as the foundation of human life and a regeneration of our relationships to each other and the earth. Our communications strategies aim to tell stories of how this is happening and a different take on current events that illustrate that different choices and different ways of thinking about what we share and how we relate are possible. A) onthecommons.org: our website features the largest amount and variety of commons content on the internet it features thousands of original articles, profiles and stories about local commons leaders, commons analysis on timely topics and commons solutions to society's challenges. Our first published e-book, celebrating the commons, was a very popular outreach and education tool. The book featured over 40 articles, stories and profiles. Our second e-book how to design our world for happiness: the commons guide to placemaking and a convivial life was published in july 2013. This e-book focuses on the relationship between the commons and placemaking and how communities are successfully creating inclusive, thriving, place-based neighborhoods. B.) commons ambassadors and commons events relationships and direct connection are central to a commons-based approach, thus convenings and speaking engagements continue to be central to our strategy. Over the past year, we have organized two larger gatherings: the great lakes commons summit at notre dame university and the commons solutions lab at blue mountain center. In addition to these larger gatherings, otc leadership also spoke at over 20 campus and community events across the country. * acting as both catalyst and incubator for commons solution making, creating space and opportunity for work that illuminate new pathways and patterns for social change. 2) expanding the practice of the commons: a) developing and linking commons leaders and leadershipcreating peer connection, a pause for shared reflection and ways to explore working in a co-creative, shared ownership environment are central to growing the commons movement. Our gatherings at notre dame, blue mountain center and other events created venues for commons leaders to connect, exchange and learn. The end result was deeper connection to the potential of the commons as a transformational path personally and culturally and documentation of our commons practices and tools.all of our work involves intentionally instilling practices of co-creation and co-leadership. For example, in the great lakes commons initiative the nucleus of this initiative's leadership has grown to over one hundred active individuals and groups, encompassing scholars and students, artists and cultural workers, activists, scientists, business executives, attorneys, first nations and tribal community members and officials, recreationalists and more. Central to this is the first meaningful and equitable alliance of indigenous and non-indigenous communities in the great lakes bioregion. B) building shared knowledge, tools and materials for the commons movementcreating and lifting up how commons work. The new online resource center (part of the expanded onthecommons.org website) highlights practices resources including the commons framework and many articles focusing on how to animate co-creation, shared power and a commons orientation in one's own community based on fieldwork from the growing commons network. The commons work newletter featuring stories from the field, case studies and highlighting key themes from the commons framework is created monthly newsletter and delivered to over 10,000 subscribers. 3) incubating commons initiativesotc designs our work and organizational capacity in a way that shares leadership, distributes power and helps animate promising commons solutions. Part of our strategy involves initiating and incubating projects in
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $35.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -128.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.4%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -29.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $335K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $31K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.