On Stage 4 Cancer Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991103587
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Green Bay, WI, USA
Phone
9206601521
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Performing Arts Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,124
Expenses
$27,970
Assets
$18,380
Liabilities
$3

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM SHEFCHIK (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINE PEOT (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JACKIE JOSEPH (BOARD MEMBER)
  • DANNY LUECK (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ERIN PATCHEK (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Raising funds for cancer thrivers.

What it reported doing in 2025

On july 31st, 2025 a fundraising event was held at riverside ballroom in green bay, Wisconsin, to raise money for a cancer thriver within the northeast Wisconsin area based upon the cancer thriver's application to on stage 4 cancer inc. The event consisted of dinner and musical performances by individuals and groups that volunteered to participate in the event. Funds were also raised by selling tickets to the event, table sponsorships, dinner, t-shirts, wine pull, and auction of baskets donated by various individuals and businesses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 93% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.4%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -62.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -58.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 48.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.