On Fire Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883474685
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Selah, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5095846455
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $126,435
- Expenses
- $113,889
- Assets
- $39,503
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dan Schilperoot (President)
People named in this filing
- Dan Schilperoot (President)
- Dave Allan (Treasurer)
- Jake Kupp (Fund Raising)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Transforming Yakima through our youth.
What it reported doing in 2024
On Fire Ministries (OFM) began its first year at Outreach Camp at Ghormley Meadows in June 24. Over 130 kids, 4-5th graders, attending a three-day free camp in the Cascade Mountains. Witnessing the overwhelming response of students standing for the first time in the hope and love of Jesus, birthed a quickening to the obvious question of now what? Within the next few months a Board was formed, established a sister relationship with ! st Pres for use their gym/kitchen on Saturday nights, enrolled volunteers, began a campaign to raise the equivalent of a $100,000 annual budget, did direct mailing, door to door canvasing, fed over 200 at Thanksgiving, handed out hundreds of Christmas gifts, built an ongoing relationship with United Way, spoke to numerous groups about the possibilities of partnering with OFM.All very exciting and evolutionary. Before the end of 2024, we were posturing for an increase in the annual budget to $180,000. Feeding and ministering on Saturday nights to 100 students and adults. Searching for locations to simplify and accommodate the changing dynamic.Yet, what is the price of the one? Out here on the streets of East Yakima, there are thousands of families wallowing in the crush of welfare mentality...which breeds all sorts of tragic cousins; weve had shattered families stand up for prayer during Wednesday night worship, weeping over being victimized by drive by shootings. Without exceptions, this community confronts an incredible degree of susceptibility in: illiteracy, joblessness, violence, fatherlessness, abuse, teen pregnancy, boredom, gang perpetration, crime, and poverty. So, we are grateful when we can rescue one from that ledge of destruction.Right now, OFM is a building project. Most citizens are reluctant to step into this dysfunction, and are just more convenient to stay removed and ignorant. Taking a huge effort to just recruit the workers for the harvest, Johnny and Nina Rodriguez have encountered a transformational awareness of how much the Lord is striving to find the one. Redeemed from the destructive cycle of gangs, incarceration and death, they are persistently spreading hope, as quickly as resources allow, across the consciousness of Yakima.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.6%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 70.6%; rating input score 71
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.6% of revenue deployed · 70.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.