Omro Area Community Center
Legal name: Omro Area Community Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391809175
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Omro, WI, US
- Phone
- 920-685-0380
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,281
- Expenses
- $71,105
- Assets
- $556,731
- Liabilities
- $202,092
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LYNN KROMM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LYNN KROMM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $21,713 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster a vibrant and inclusive community by providing a welcoming space where individuals of all ages can connect, engage in diverse programs, and participate in activities that promote personal growth, cultural enrichment, and social well-being.
What it reported doing in 2024
To promote a multi-use & multi-generational community center for the citizens of the city of omro & the surronding areas & communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 67% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 10
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2%; rating input score 2
- Program expense ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 3
- Fundraising efficiency: $29.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.4%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.83; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.5%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 2% of revenue deployed · 2.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $22K · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 24 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.