Omg Women Outreaching Women
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811417246
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3108100963
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,196
- Expenses
- $2,559
- Assets
- $971
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PEGGY WHITE (CEO)
- CARMEN BOWEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PEGGY WHITE (CEO)
- CARMEN BOWEN (PRESIDENT)
- KIMBERLY MARTIN (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Offer support to black women through enlightenment, education
What it reported doing in 2025
Participants of the omg w.o.w 12-module course will acquire the tools to construct a solid foundation for building a successful business while gaining knowledge of the difference between an entrepreneur and a business owner. The learning tools include information on finance, relationship building, enterprise, spiritual development, and overall health, which makes up the f.r.e.s.h. Educational program. These components will serve as a resource to participants throughout their journey in business and entrepreneurship. The f.r.e.s.h. Program will aid cohorts during the course in developing an overall understanding of their needs and become a pathway towards their overall success. The purpose of the f.r.e.s.h. Program is to allow participants to start, develop, or maintain their business using the fundamentals, and then use the tools to grow the business and as a blueprint to scale.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -164.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 164% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.