Omega Home Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820835741
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,517
- Expenses
- $78,294
- Assets
- $129,749
- Liabilities
- $1,171
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kelley Scott (Executive Director)
- Jo Ellen Strieter (Vice President)
- Kim Adams (President)
People named in this filing
- Kelley Scott (Executive Director)
- Jo Ellen Strieter (Vice President)
- Kim Adams (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Omega Home Network is a non-profit national membership organization that promotes the development and expansion of community homes for people who are dying. Through information sharing consultation and educational offerings we provide direct assistance to those developing and operating homes in their communities. We strongly believe in sharing our model so that every willing and able community can have an Omega Home. To those who want to provide the experience of home and extended family to people at the end of life the Network offers an information bridge to making that happen in their own communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 24 new members joined Omega Home Network and 5 new homes opened for care. OHN presented 28 webinars which provided support and networking to 171 participants. The OHN online forum received 15,167 pageviews 239 posts with 23 first time contributors and 1,818 user visits. Training resources offered included a start-up manual PowerPoint showcasing the need for Omega Homes journal articles brochures medical hospice comparison tool monthly e-newsletters and quarterly best-practice webinars.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.4%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 56.3%; rating input score 56
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.5%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 31.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.4% of revenue deployed · 56.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $44K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.