Omaha Center for Refugee & Immigrant Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873655357
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Omaha, NE, USA
- Phone
- 5318677543
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Academic Exchange
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,480
- Expenses
- $127,476
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ABDI MOHAMED (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LADAN YUSUF (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ABDI MOHAMED (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LADAN YUSUF (PRESIDENT)
- THUBO ACHWIL (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Omaha center for refugee & immigrant services inc.(ocrisi) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to serving and empowering immigrants and refugees in omaha, Nebraska. With a deep commitment to promoting their successful integration and ensuring their well-being, we provide a range of comprehensive services, advocacy, and resources.
What it reported doing in 2024
Youth programs and services we believe in the transformative power of education mentoring and leadership development. Our organization offers educational support and mentoring programs to children youth and adult learners. We assist with school enrollment provide tutoring and homework assistance and offer help with scholarship or financial aid applications.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.2%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 55.7%; rating input score 56
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.8%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 55.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.2% of revenue deployed · 55.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $71K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.