Om Namo

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831291686
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Fallon, NV, USA
Phone
9493948406
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$165,265
Expenses
$121,893
Assets
$64,318
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KADIE ZELLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ANDREA VAN LEUVEN (BOARD PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BLANE MERKLEY (BOARD TREASURER)
  • LAUREN CAMACHO (BOARD MEMBER)
  • KADIE ZELLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improve the quality of life in northern Nevada communities by providing educational events and gatherings that promote wellness and culture.

What it reported doing in 2024

Buckaroo traditions gathering (btg): btg is dedicated to preserving and promoting the skills and crafts of the buckaroo, educating the public about the ranching and agricultural history of the great basin, and providing access to wellness and crisis resources for rural/frontier and tribal community members across the nation. In 2024, the 3-day event reached 1993 attendees from the us and canada, 102 competing participants, and hosted 7 resource partners. Btg was featured in three different national publications, including western horsemen, ropers sports news, and cowboys and indians, that educated readers about the history of buckaroo culture and the importance of mental health wellness in cowboy and agricultural communities. Additionally, btg was granted a marketing and tourism grant to spread awareness and education about the community, culture, and event.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.1%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.1% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $111K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.