Olympus High School Mountain Bike Team
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352620836
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Holladay, UT, USA
- Phone
- 3853017230
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $39,655
- Expenses
- $35,000
- Assets
- $30,396
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Stuart Anderson (President)
People named in this filing
- Rosie Gillespe (Head Coach)
- Stuart Anderson (President)
- Esther May (Treasurer/Team Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Undertake and support educational and charitable activities to strengthen body mind and character and promote life-long health and fitness through cycling with particular emphasis on education of high school and middle school age young adults, impact the lives of youth through cycling and related academic and social instruction and to promote leadership, discipline, hard work and excellence.
What it reported doing in 2025
We provided coaches, training, leadership opportunities, community outreach opportunities, social opportunities and race support for 107 high school and middle school youth. It was amazing to see the growth of this kids. During race season we provided at least 2 training events per week and support for 5 races. 3 of which were for middle school and 1 that was high school only and a state race that was for all who qualified to be there.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 49% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.2% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.