Olympic Peninsula Visitor Bureau
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911355604
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Port Angeles, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3604528552
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,494,011
- Expenses
- $1,300,634
- Assets
- $810,804
- Liabilities
- $34,600
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARSHA C MASSEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- INGRID GOODWIN (PRESIDENT)
- JORDAN SCHIEFEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARSHA C MASSEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $110,899 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Tourism promotion for the north olympic peninsula, Washington
What it reported doing in 2025
Promotion of tourism and convention business on the north olympic peninsula, Washington
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 70% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 26
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 81%; rating input score 81; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $885K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.