Old Friends Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474792158
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Redmond, WA, USA
Phone
4256819776
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,875
Expenses
$87,198
Assets
$122,039
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Robert Delf (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Charmaine Vazquez (Board Chair)
  • Jane Dickson (Treasurer)
  • Karen Koenig (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Old Friends Club equips communities to offer affordable caregiver respite through social daytime dementia care programs to cultivate joy in the lives of adults with cognitive challenges and nourish the well-being of caregivers.

What it reported doing in 2025

Surpassed 75000 hours of respite provided. Continued to grow the network of social respite programs with four Affiliate Clubs running in Carnation, Enumclaw, Mercer Island, and Vashon Island. Two additional respite programs are running in Skagit and Whatcom Counties that launched using the Old Friends Club Toolkit. Expanding to 6 Affiliate Clubs in Washington in March 2026, with goal of 12 Affiliate Clubs by the end of 2026.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.5%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 82.1%; rating input score 82

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.5% of revenue deployed · 82.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $72K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.