Old Concho Community Assistance Cen

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860907044
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Concho, AZ, USA
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$479,828
Expenses
$455,681
Assets
$1,587,480
Liabilities
$979,982

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARILYN JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SHIFRA BOEHLJE (PRESIDENT)
  • SHAWN COVAL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN DAVIS (ASSISTANT DIRECTOR)
  • MARILYN JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • NICOLE RIGGS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Old concho community assistance inc provides assistance and energy relief, which consists of aid with utilities, rents, repair and replacement of appliances, housing repairs and weatherization, food and guidance, educat

What it reported doing in 2023

Apache new start, bridging northern Arizona, little Colorado and good shepherd are permanent supportive housing programs for the seriously mental ill or disabled, low income and chronically homeless population. Case management as well as family team building with agency collaborations are some of the services this population is offered. Old concho assists with rent and utilities, food and other supportive services as needed. Adoh & rapid rehousing as well as temporary emergencies service grant. Homeless prevention and rapid rehousing provides housing and utilitiy assistance to the homeless, about to become homeless families in apache and navajo counties. The purpose is to prevent clients from becoming homeless. Clients are assisted with complete living assistance and education on living skill as needed to give individuals and families a chance to become self sufficient. Nacog is a program to assist clients with housing, utilities, weatherization, appliance repair and/or replacement. See services

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 43% for direct work, and 57% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 72
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.1%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 62.5%; rating input score 62; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.48; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -48.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -56.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.1% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $380K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.