Old Bridge Auxiliary Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222230979
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Perth Amboy, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7323245401
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,213
- Expenses
- $27,220
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH VIVIANI (PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
- ADELE O'HARA (VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
- BARBARA LAZO (VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
- TRUDY GETTY (VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
- CAROL HECK (VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
People named in this filing
- JOSEPH VIVIANI (PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
- ADELE O'HARA (VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
- BARBARA LAZO (VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the charitable tax-exempt purposes, programs and services of raritan bay medical center; a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization which provides medically necessary healthcare services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory manner regardless of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, religion or ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2015
Expenses incurred in supporting the charitable purposes, programs and services of raritan bay medical center; a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization which provides medically necessary healthcare services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory manner regardless of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, religion or abilty to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.4%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 47.2%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.4% of revenue deployed · 47.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.