Olathe Northwest High School Raven Pride Band Boosters Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510491521
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Olathe, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9137807150
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $151,157
- Expenses
- $154,307
- Assets
- $27,033
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shelley Hunter (President)
- Katie Garcia (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Shelley Hunter (President)
- Katie Garcia (Vice-President)
- Susan Johnson (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The enrichment of music for high school students by promoting and supporting the band at Olathe Northwest High School. To provide financial support for equipment, supplies, trips and other band activities. To enhance good communication and coordination with the Olathe Northwest High School administration, band directors, students, and parents.
What it reported doing in 2024
Marching band competed in regional festivals placing in top five regularly. Also performed at home football games and other community events. 200 student participants and thousands of fans.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 68% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.5%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 94.6%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.5% of revenue deployed · 94.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $146K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.