Oklahomans for Responsible Transportation Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933126601
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Norman, OK, USA
Phone
4053138937
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,415
Expenses
$7,010
Assets
$27,270
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY B CERATO (PRESIDENT)
  • WHITNEY MULLICA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • AMY B CERATO (PRESIDENT)
  • WHITNEY MULLICA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TIFFANY STEPHENS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To empower communities through grass-roots education, outreach, community engagement and policy development.

What it reported doing in 2025

Education - educate the community about proposed transportation policy and plans through meetings, events, and newslettersoutreach and community engagement - inform, involve, and assist community members with policy development and and engaging with stakeholders

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.9%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.89; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 88.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 58.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 85% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.9% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.