Oklahoma Tribal Gaming Regulators Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830458398
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Miami, OK, USA
Phone
4058784838
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$130,968
Expenses
$113,149
Assets
$251,888
Liabilities
$1,653

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ASHLEY BURNSIDE (CHAIRPERSON)
  • CRYSTAL HOUSTON (VICE CHAIRPE)
  • RENE SMITH (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Oklahoma tribal gaming regulators associations' purpose is to promote and encourage the highest standards of ethics for tribal gaming regulation in Oklahoma, to facilitate communication among Oklahoma tribal gaming regulators through networking, to provide opportunities for affordable training in Oklahoma for Oklahoma tribal regulators and casino management covering all aspects of regulation and issues of concern in tribal gaming, to create a wider recognition of the importance of regulation in tribal gaming as it pertains to meeting tribal, state and federal regulation requirements, specifically for the protection of the Oklahoma tribal gaming industry and to promote and perpetuate the integrity of Oklahoma tribal gaming, and lastly to conduct and promote such other logical activities that will enhance the growth and success of tribal gaming regulation for the economic benefit of the casinos and tribal governments in Oklahoma.

What it reported doing in 2024

Oklahoma tribal gaming regulators association purpose is to promote and encourage the highest standards of ethics for tribal gaming regulation in Oklahoma.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.6%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.23; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.