Oklahoma State Medical Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 730384245
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4056019571
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,367,845
- Expenses
- $4,929,191
- Assets
- $149,553,071
- Liabilities
- $374,420
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
47 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUMIT NANDA MD (PRESIDENT)
- JULIE STREBEL MD (PRESIDENT EL)
Highest reported compensation
- WESLEY D GLINSMANN (EXECUTIVE DI): $262,383 total reported compensation
- SUMIT NANDA MD (PRESIDENT): $23,482 total reported compensation
- R KEVIN MOORE MD (SECRETARY/TR): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for Oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. Osma's mission is better health for Oklahoma.
What it reported doing in 2025
Member services: osma is the leading resource to help physicians sustain their practices and promote public health in Oklahoma. The organization has expanded its offerings of continuing education programs to meet the needs of physicians, who must complete such programs to maintain their medical licenses. Our physicians campaign for a healthier Oklahoma supports efforts to combat the effects of obesity in the state and provides resources to Oklahoma physician practices to promote public health. The association operates various councils and committees that work with specific populations of its membership to help address their unique practice needs. Osma offers a variety of resources for physicians with mental health needs or those battling substance abuse issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 30.34; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 46 of 46 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $262K · 47 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.