Oklahoma Rural Letter Carriers Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
730943133
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Collinsville, OK, USA
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$166,361
Expenses
$173,981
Assets
$322,765

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Delonna Callaway (President)
  • Jana Tiger (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Delonna Callaway (President)
  • Jana Tiger (Vice President)
  • Michele Hester (Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Association is dedicated to the discharge of its responsibilities and the achievement of its objectives in accordance with the democratic principles embodied in the Constitution. The objective of the Association shall be to improve conditions of labor with the United States Postal Service advance the methods used by Rural Letter Carriers and promote fraternal spirit among its members.

What it reported doing in 2024

State Meetings are to inform and answer questions to 2,084 rural carrier members of whom want to attend. All eight district meetings have our district representatives inform us on changes and answer all questions to help us succeed. Both our district and national representatives attend our state convention with information we need. We also have guest speakers from management safety and many others who work with rural carriers. Members have the ability to make and vote on constitution changes and resolutions with state and national. Members get to vote for our state board at the convention and vote for national delegates by mail which are both counted and results are read by the committee chairperson.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.6%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -92% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.