Oklahoma Retired Firefighters Associatio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934240847
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4058442222
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $175,793
- Expenses
- $163,658
- Assets
- $201,732
- Liabilities
- $180
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARSHALL DUNHAM (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARSHALL DUNHAM (PRESIDENT)
- ERICK REYNOLDS (SECRETARY & TREASURER)
- GORDON GINGRICH (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Oklahoma retired firefighters association is to serve the best interests of theassociation members by protecting and improving the Oklahoma firefighters pension and retirement system.
What it reported doing in 2024
Orfa ensures the success of emergency fire services by working with paid and retired Oklahoma firefighters throughout the state of Oklahoma.we provide information to retired firefighters of the state of Oklahoma regarding accidental death policy for retired firefighters, emergencytransport membership insurance, legislative information and bills to enhance benefits for retired firefighters and a way to make life better afterserving as a firefighter in Oklahoma.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.7%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.7% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.