Oklahoma Public Health Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237159694
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 5804655328
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,559
- Expenses
- $88,470
- Assets
- $96,092
- Liabilities
- $20
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tracy Freudenthaler (2023-2024 President, 2024-2025 Past-President)
- Daniel Sledge (2023-2024 Development Chair / President-Elect, 2024-2025 President)
- McKenzie Cowlbeck (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Tracy Freudenthaler (2023-2024 President, 2024-2025 Past-President)
- Daniel Sledge (2023-2024 Development Chair / President-Elect, 2024-2025 President)
- Wendi Middleton (2023-2024 Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To protect and promote public health in Oklahoma through education, practice, and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
The American Public Health Association and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Grant activities included creating educational content on public health policy, including tracking public health legislation and growing OPHA's Policy Committee.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.7%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 49.3%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -37.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.7% of revenue deployed · 49.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $44K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.