Oklahoma Psychiatric Physicians Assoc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 736111803
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Norman, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4053605066
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,335
- Expenses
- $50,729
- Assets
- $26,551
- Liabilities
- $248
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gabriel Cuka MD (Vice President)
- Rachel Dalthorp MD (President)
- Jason Beaman MD (TPS-President)
- Eleanor Lastrapes MD (COPS-President)
People named in this filing
- Joseph Michie MD (Counc.-at-Large)
- Jay Lensgraf MD (Counc.-at-Large)
- Harold Ginzburg MD (Delegate)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Oklahoma Psychiatric Physicians Association (OPPA), is dedicated to meeting the professional needs of its members and promoting quality treatment and prevention of mental illness and substance use disorders. In performing these functions, members of the OPPA are mindful of the unique history and cultural diversity of Oklahoma, and the influence of social determinants on health and outcomes. We aspire to model and support: * sensitivity and compassion for patients and their families * advocacy for mental health access and equity * promotion of diversity and inclusion * advancement and representation of the profession of psychiatry * lifelong professional learning and * the highest standards of professional conduct.
What it reported doing in 2025
The annual Scientific Conference of OPPA was held on April 26, 2025, at the SAMIS Education Center at OU Children's Hospital, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. "Trauma, Terrorism, Disasters and Preparedness: Medical and Psychiatric Considerations" provided attendees with 5.5 hours of AMA PRA Category 1 Continuing Medical Education. The program was jointly provided by the American Psychiatric Association, the Oklahoma Psychiatric Physicians Association and the Oklahoma University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma City.Physicians discussed the definitions of disaster psychiatry, disaster medicine and disaster preparedness for a community; explained the psychiatric aftermaths in survivors of various forms of life-threatening traumas and for those who experienced them vicariously; and reviewed various acute and chronic physical and psychiatric symptoms-syndromes induced by the life-threatening trauma, traumatic bereavement and contemporary treatment approaches addressing these events.A) The Central Oklahoma Psychiatric Society and the Tulsa Psychiatric Association (both local chapters) each sponsored additional seminars. Topics included: 1) "Psycho-Oncology and Cultural Differences in Disciplining" - March 27, 2025 2) "The Kratom Kraze and Alcohol-Associated Intimate Partner Violence" - June 12, 2025 3) "Medical Marijuana: Smokescreen, Pandora's Box or a Panacea? and Scissors, Sleep and Psychosis"- September 18, 2025 4) "Violence Risk Assessment for General Mental Health Clinicians and Treatment of Aggressive Behavior in Children and Adolescents" - November 13, 2025 B) The Oklahoma Psychiatric Physicians Association also hosted its Annual Business and Membership meeting at the Renaissance Waterford Hotel in Oklahoma City on Saturday, April 26, 2025. This meeting included a legislative update, presentation of student awards, recognition of member advancements and installation of 2024-2025 officers and councilors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.1%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 24.3%; rating input score 24
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 67.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.1% of revenue deployed · 24.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 28 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.