Oklahoma Heart Hospital Volunteer Auxiliary Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
870698579
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Phone
4056083388
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,885
Expenses
$30,177
Assets
$99,278

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DON KEETON (President)
  • DELLA WATSON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DON KEETON (President)
  • DELLA WATSON (Vice President)
  • TALOVA JONES (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Auxiliary is formed exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes. Its primary activity is addressing the needs of patients of the Oklahoma Heart Hospital (the Hospital) by proving charitable services to those patients and their families that would not otherwise be provided by the Hospital. In addition, the Auxiliary engages in activities that involve promotion of the health of the community and advancement of education in areas related to healthcare. The Auxiliary provides the following services to patients of the Hospital: information, waiting room escorts, coffee in waiting areas, supplementing the waiting room environment by maintaining magazines and newspapers, assembling educational material for patient admission packets, assistance with errands, and monitoring website correspondence for patients during their stay at the Hospital. The Auxiliary assists needy patients and their families with basic assistance such as helping the patients without insurance obta

What it reported doing in 2014

Total program patient beneficiary funds

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -68.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.29; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -48.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.