Oklahoma FCCLA Alumni & Associates

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731556655
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Stillwater, OK, USA
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,742
Expenses
$134,544
Assets
$373,335
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Brittani Phillips (State Advisor)
  • Abby Werth (Board Chairman)
  • Gabriella Cutruzzula (Past Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Supporting Future Leaders

What it reported doing in 2025

The Oklahoma FCCLA Alumni & Associates (OAA) is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes to support the mission of Oklahoma FCCLA and Family and Consumer Sciences education. Through scholarships, leadership development, alumni engagement, fundraising, and strategic partnerships, OAA invests in preparing youth to become leaders in their families, careers, and communities. During the year, OAA provided financial and volunteer support for programs that expand leadership opportunities for youth participating in Oklahoma FCCLA. Resources raised by the organization help students develop leadership, communication, career readiness, employability, and service-learning skills through conferences, competitive events, educational programming, and leadership experiences across the state. OAA also works to remove financial barriers to participation by funding scholarships and supporting educational opportunities for students pursuing postsecondary education and leadership development. The organization engages alumni, business and industry partners, educators, and community members in supporting the next generation of leaders through charitable giving, volunteer service, and mentorship. During the reporting year, OAA successfully hosted its inaugural Forever Red Gala, bringing together alumni, supporters, and community partners to raise charitable funds that will provide long-term scholarship support for Oklahoma FCCLA members. The event established a foundation for sustained philanthropic investment in youth leadership and education while strengthening alumni engagement and community partnerships. Through these activities, OAA advances its charitable mission by promoting educational excellence, leadership development, workforce preparation, community service, and lifelong learning for Oklahomas youth while ensuring the continued growth and impact of Oklahoma FCCLA for future generations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.3%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.6%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.77; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 38.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.3% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.