Oklahoma City Police Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922192115
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Phone
4056305930
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,611,115
Expenses
$336,697
Assets
$2,650,402
Liabilities
$482

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JARED FRAZIER (CEO)
  • MIKE VOORHEES (PRESIDENT)
  • MINDY FREYMILLER (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JARED FRAZIER (CEO): $178,248 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Oklahoma city police foundation is committed to enhancing the endeavors of the Oklahoma city police department.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our mission involves providing both financial and non-monetary resources that align closely with the department's mission and vision, including providing critical equipment, specialized training, holistic wellness resources, and community enhancement. We also play a crucial role in bridging resource gaps within the department's annual budget, sponsoring activities like the annual awards banquet, and offering wellness resources for employees facing personal challenges or significant life events.underlining our commitment to addressing the true needs of the officers in the field, it is the frontline officers who submit grant requests based on their firsthand knowledge. These requests, reflecting the genuine needs of the department, undergo careful consideration, and final decisions are subsequently presented to the board of directors for approval. The foundation's board of directors makes these decisions following our steadfast mission and vision. Join us in this noble cause and be part of our ongoing efforts to support and strengthen the Oklahoma city police department.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 10
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.3%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 25.6%; rating input score 26
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 87.1%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.87; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 52.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 115% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 122% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.3% of revenue deployed · 25.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $178K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.