Oklahoma City Human Resources Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731502433
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4055936997
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,831
- Expenses
- $126,689
- Assets
- $121,936
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kelly Potter (President)
- Kyra Pope (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- Rebecca Hartwig (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Kelly Potter (President)
- Kyra Pope (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- Rebecca Hartwig (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve competence of human resource professionals, to raise thestandards of performance in all phases of human resources and to encourageadherence to the organizations and the society for human resourcemanagement's code of ethics.
What it reported doing in 2025
The purpose of the society, as a non-profit organization, shall be: toimprove competence of human resource professionals; to raise the standardsof performance in all phases of human resources; to encourage adherence tothe society (ochrs) and the society for human resource management's (shrm)code of ethics. To achieve the purpose of the society there shall be nodiscrimination in individual memberships or chapter affiliations because ofrace, religion, sex, age, national origin, or disability. The society isorganized and shall be operated exclusively for professional, educational, and charitable purposes. In the furtherance of such purposes, it shall beauthorized to: a. Support the goals and objectives of the society in orderto reflect the highest standards of the human resources managementprofession. B. Support the personal and professional development programsof the society in personnel administration and industrial relations to help create an environment of recognition and support of human values in theworkplace. C. Support the self-enforcement provisions in the codes ofother associations to achieve the overall goal of development of eachperson to his or her full human potential. D. Display unity andcohesiveness of purpose in bringing fair and equitable treatment of allpeople to the forefront of employers' thought. E. Practice respect andregard for each other as a paramount personal commitment to a life-styleexemplary in its motivation toward making business profitable in both humanand monetary values. F. Express in the workplace through corporate codesthe basic rules governing moral conduct of the members of the organizationin order to provide employees and the public with a sense of confidenceabout the conduct and intentions of management. G. Personally refrain fromusing their official positions (regular or volunteer) to secure specialprivilege, gain or benefit for themselves, their employers or the society.h. Corporately the society will support and promote diversity in theworkplace, the society, and the human resources profession
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.