Oklahoma Childrens Agencies & Residential Enterprises Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731582159
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Sand Springs, OK, USA
Phone
4052099717
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community Mental Health Center

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,904
Expenses
$46,630
Assets
$221,325

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER ABNEY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER ABNEY (PRESIDENT)
  • TERRY OWENS (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JORDAN SANCHEZ (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is the mission of okcare to improve the quality of life of children in the state of Oklahoma, especially those who require placement outside their homes; to formulate and promote standards for quality child care services and practice; to facilitate the education of child care professionals and to engage in and promote study and research concerning the care of children. Fall conference promotes members to come together for collaboration and training. Okcares pays for training, lunch and breakfast for two days and for large rooms to meet in. Legislative breakfast is a time members go to the Oklahoma state capital and meet legislators. Okcare and members do not lobby. Okcare want legislators to be informed which foster care/residential agencies are located within their voting area. If a member wants to attend the legislative breakfast, they will buy a table. Okcare provides breakfast, rents a room, and provides a trophy for the lawmaker of the year.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization does not have programs

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.75; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -91.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.