Oklahoma Baseball Coaches Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851355768
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Mcalester, OK, USA
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,970
- Expenses
- $58,414
- Assets
- $54,649
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RYAN PHILLIPS (President)
- LUKE YOST (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- RANDY HUGHES (Executive Dir.)
- ROB FRIESEN (Treasurer)
- RYAN PHILLIPS (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Oklahoma Baseball Coaches Association (OBCA) is dedicated to thegrowth and advancement of high school baseball throughout the state ofOklahoma. Our mission is to support and educate coaches by providingvaluable resources, professional development opportunities and coachingstrategies through organized clinics and events. We strive to recognizeand celebrate the outstanding achievement of both coaches andstudent-athletes by honoring their contributions to the game. Additionally, we are committed to showcasing the talent of Oklahoma's baseball playersthrough events such as the Oklahoma All-State banquet and All-Stategames. Through these initiatives, the OBCA seeks to foster a culture ofexcellence, sportsmanship, and continued development within the baseballcommunity across the state.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.4%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -26.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.4% of revenue deployed · 72.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.