Ojai Community Farmers Market
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 854127491
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Ojai, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8057011210
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food, Agriculture, and Nutrition N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,816
- Expenses
- $71,349
- Assets
- $31,849
- Liabilities
- $1,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE LOPEZ (PRESIDENT)
- JULIE GERARD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE LOPEZ (PRESIDENT)
- JULIE GERARD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- HEATH PERRY (BOARD MEMBER AND OPERATIONS DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate consumers about our food system, hold space for farmers and producers to interact directly with their customers, and partner with our local schools to promote healthy lifestyles and deeper community connection
What it reported doing in 2024
OCFM operates a weekly farmers' market to provide customers with access to local, organic food grown or made in the community. Vendors sold over $560,000 worth of produce, baked goods, prepared food and artisan goods in 2023 (54% of sales from local farmers selling direct to customers). In 2023, OCFM granted $8,900 to market customers enrolled in EBT/CalFresh to spend on fruits and vegetables and $6,700 to local musicians to perform during the market.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $71K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.