Ohs Athletic Projects Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205129724
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Lascassas, TN, USA
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,178
Expenses
$12,931
Assets
$353,903

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BENJAMIN LIVINGSTON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BENJAMIN LIVINGSTON (PRESIDENT)
  • PAIGE LIVINGSTON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ohs athletic projects club, inc. Is a club that is established for the sole benefit of oakland high school in murfreesboro, Tennessee. The mission of the organization is to organize fundraising activities for the benefit of the athletic community at oakland high school.

What it reported doing in 2013

Ohs athletic projects club was able to provide maintenance and needed equipment to the athletic community at oakland high school.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.2%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 77.8%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 27.37; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.