Ohmazing Art of Healing Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812041833
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6197262680
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Cancer
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,500
- Expenses
- $22,861
- Assets
- $10,029
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NADAR S RAZI (CEO)
People named in this filing
- NADAR S RAZI (CEO)
- FARNAZ SHARIFRAZI (Secretary)
- JASMINE R JONES (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ohamazing art of healing(oah) is a non-profit community organization that promotes healthy mind, body, and spirit to those people who are suffering, have suffered , and those who have lost loved ones to cancer.oah provides holistic services as alternative treatments for cancer versus conventional treatments.the mission of this organization is to facilitate community's overall wellness, reduce stress, and improve health and personal growth through knowlwdge and practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
Oah is determined to educate people on healing the body through holistic practices. Oah is a safe and caring environment for individuals to network with other survivors who can share their journey as well as their health practices. Gaining knowledge to strengthen oneself is half the battle. Fear should not be part of the equation in choosing the right treatment for cancer. We believe that with a balanced mind, body, and spirit, people can create wellness and healing in their lives. Oah welcomes underprivileged patients who cannot afford alternantive medicine.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.