Ohio Wildlife Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311182372
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Powell, OH, USA
Phone
6147939453
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Sanctuary, Refuge

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,854,122
Expenses
$1,620,743
Assets
$5,871,794
Liabilities
$139,186

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HEATHER TUTTLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • HEATHER TUTTLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $111,473 total reported compensation
  • LORI WILLIAMS (FINANCIAL MANAGER(THROUGH 11/30/25)): $31,519 total reported compensation
  • RENEE HAWKINS (FINANCIAL MANAGER (12/1/25 - PRESENT)): $826 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ohio wildlife center is dedicated to fostering awareness and appreciation of Ohio's native wildlife through rehabilitation, education, and wildlife health studies. The center is the state's largest, donation-supported wildlife hospital and is a leader for wildlife rescue and rehabilitation. Nearly 8,700 injured, ill, or orphaned wildlife are presented to Ohio wildlife center for rehabilitation care from more than 60 of the 88 counties in Ohio.

What it reported doing in 2025

Wildlife rehabilitation: caring for ill, injured, and orphaned wildlife with the goal of their healthy release back into the wild is the primary mission of Ohio wildlife center. In 2025, the center admitted 8,700 animals for care, the center partners with its team of volunteers and local correctional \institutions to provide care for admitted animals offsite. Patients require regular ongoing feeding, quiet surroundings, and care. The center's pre-release facility replicates natural environments for animals on the last leg of their journey. Staff and volunteers provide basic needs like food and monitor animals for key behaviors to ensure they are healthy and capable of being released back to the wild.wildlife & conservation education programsohio wildlife center strives to instill a greater appreciation and understanding of wild animals and can help prevent harmful interactions thus reducing the number of animals admitted to its donation-based animal hospital.Ohio wildlife center offers education programs for all ages. Programs are offered both on and offsite with a focus on reducing community wildlife conflicts through an appreciation of native species. In 2025, Ohio wildlife center led 321 on and offsite programs, reaching approximately 22,409 people. These programs included 23 second sunday and wild story times, reaching approximately 1,392 people. Ohio wildlife center also hosted summer camp for 310 children ages 3 through 16.all programs are supported by over 60 animals ambassadors representing many of Ohio's native species. All of the ambassadors were former patients of the wildlife hospital and became ambassadors when they were diagnosed as non-releasable, either due to a permanent injury that affects their ability to hunt successfully or because they had already been inhabited to human care. These animals are permanent residents of Ohio wildlife center and are cared for every day by the education staff as well as rotating interns from our partnership with otterbein university.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.2%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.6%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.62; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.2% of revenue deployed · 70.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.