Ohio Valley Society of Plastic Surgeons

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204578285
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
North Ridgeville, OH, USA
Phone
2163755025
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,120
Expenses
$146,220
Assets
$114,244
Liabilities
$4,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RAYMOND ISAKOV MD (PRESIDENT)
  • AARON C MASON MD (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • ANDREA A MOREIRA MD (VICE PRESIDE)
  • ANANTH S MURTHY MD (HISTORIAN)
  • JOSHUA M ADKINSON MD (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote innovative technology regarding the art and science of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The target audience will include physicians, residents and allied healthcare personnel in and around the Ohio valley region. Our goal will be achieved via didactic lectures, panel discussions and resident presentations.

What it reported doing in 2024

The society holds the annual scientific meeting for students, residents, fellows and attending surgeons to highlight new technologies, new treatment modalities and new techniques in plastic and reconstructive surgery. In addition, the program serves to educate these individuals on patient safety topics and research occurring within the region thereby expanding the breadth and scope of plastic surgeons. The meeting also provides continuing education programs and exhibits displaying new products and services to its 90 members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -27%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 29.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.