CohRev

Legal name: Ohio Valley Medical Center Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550614866
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2016
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Tigard, OR, United States
Phone
+1 (503) 686-3790
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,366,871
Expenses
$114,211,526
Assets
$56,668,990
Liabilities
$43,011,075

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michael Caruso (CEO/President/Trustee)

Highest reported compensation

  • Sushil Mehrotra MD (Medical Oncologist): $815,749 total reported compensation
  • Robert Caveney MD (Orthopedic Physician): $546,188 total reported compensation
  • Jessica Ybanez-Morano MD (OB/GYN Physician): $503,120 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The medical staff and employees of OVMC are committed to providing high-quality, cost-effective care to promote the health and well-being of those living in our community. To achieve this charitable goal, OVMC delivers specialized. hospital-based care and outpatient services and offers health, wellness, and professional education programs.

What it reported doing in 2016

Ohio Valley Medical Center Inc (OVMC) is an acute care facility which provides a teaching program to physician residents/interns and also provides specialty services such as a psychiatric/chemical dependency unit. OVMC provides quality medical healthcare, including acute inpatient care, and outpatient services, to the public regardless of race, creed, sex, natural origin, handicap, age or ability to pay. Although reimbursement for services rendered is critical to the operation and stability of OVMC, it is recognized that not all individuals possess the ability to purchase essential medical services. It is the mission of the hospital to service the community with respect to providing healthcare medical services and healthcare education. Therefore, in keeping with the hospital's commitment to service all members of the community: free care and/or subsidized care was provided during the year: care was provided to persons covered by government programs which reimburse the hospital at below cost during the year; and health activities and programs to support the community were conducted during the year. In addition to providing essential healthcare services to the community, other activities conducted during the year included wellness, community education and special programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 89
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 85.5%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 85.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $97.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $816K · 16 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.1M reported
  • Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.