Ohio Valley Branch the Mining Electromechanical Maintenance Assoc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841747827
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Wheeling, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3045513250
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $77,457
- Expenses
- $38,571
- Assets
- $225,471
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL MCGEE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PAUL MCGEE (PRESIDENT)
- CHAD KLEEH (VICE PRESIDE)
- KEN HARVEY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote safety and the efficient operation of mining machinery and associated equipment; to provide an opportunity for the interchange of experience and information on mining maintenance problems of mutual interest; to provide a means through which the members will have an opportunity to increase their knowledge in the application, selection, installation, care and operation of mining machinery and associated equipment; to cooperate with its members and the mining industry in the development, intelligent application and proper installation and maintenance of mechanical and electrical mining machinery and associated equipment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.3%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.2%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.85; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.