Ohio Troopers Caring
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311197113
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-PF 2023
- Location
- Gahanna, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6147817686
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,640
- Expenses
- $32,869
- Assets
- $92,234
- Liabilities
- $31,557
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID RICHENDOLLAR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DENNIS GORSKI (CHAIRMAN)
- CHRISTOPHER COLBERT (TREASURER)
- TOMMY DAVIS (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To conduct the charitable activities of the Ohio troopers. To conduct the school and hospital programs. To educate children of the danger of drugs, alcohol and other illegal substances.
What it reported doing in 2025
1.to bargain collectively with the employer, while designated as the duly- elected or certified employee organization representing the troopers, sergeants, dispatchers, communication and electronic technicians, concerning conditions of their employment, compensation, hours, working conditions, and other aspects of their employment pursuant to chapter 4117 of the Ohio revised code; 2.to organize and maintain an organization of representation for the members of the association; 3.to maintain an avenue of direct communication between the members of the association and the superintendent of the highway patrol, the director of the department of public safety, the civil service commission, and the office of collective bargaining, and any other agency within the state of Ohio. 4.to secure and insure the rightful respect for the individual dignity of every member of the association and every law enforcement officer in the highway patrol. 5.to promote a spirit among members of the association of cooperation and fellowship. 6.to develop a high regard for the vocations of the Ohio state highway patrol. 7.to gather, receive and disseminate such information concerning law enforcement service and other employment standards as may be helpful to the membership in the pursuit of their calling; 8.to give cooperation to, and arrange unified action with the administrative heads of state agencies and departments for the greater good of the citizens of Ohio, the department of public safety, the Ohio state highway patrol and the members of the association. 9.to develop pride and morale in the membership and department so that the image projected by our members to the people we serve is an honest picture of dedicated law enforcement professionals exemplifying the best in all standards of the law enforcement profession. 10.receive, manage, invest, expend, and otherwise use moneys and property of this organization to achieve the objectives set forth in these by-laws, as well as all other rights and privileges set forth for corporations as set forth in the Ohio revised code. 11.furnish services to all individuals, groups or bodies as required to further the aims and purposes of the association.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 68.7%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.81; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -98% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -57.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 68.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 40 of 40 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.