Ohio State University Alumni Club of Myrtle Beach

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993943433
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,736
Expenses
$1,392
Assets
$3,344

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brian Biddish (President)
  • Ellen Barney (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brian Biddish (President)
  • Ellen Barney (Vice President)
  • Michelle Hann (Tresurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To generate relationships of Ohio State Alumni friends and fans in the Myrtle Beach area of South Carolina.

What it reported doing in 2025

Donations made to our organization are directed towards our scholarship program which is tailored to support local high school graduates in pursuing their higher education at the Ohio State University Columbus campus. This initiative aims to provide financial assistance to deserving students from our community enabling them to fulfill their academic aspirations and contribute positively to society. Through these scholarships we strive to empower individuals with the opportunity to access quality education and achieve their full potential ultimately fostering a brighter future for both the recipients and the broader community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.6%; rating input score 11
  • Program expense ratio: 35.9%; rating input score 36

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.4; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.6% of revenue deployed · 35.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $500 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.