Ohio Jury Management Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912085650
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2008–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6144874475
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $15,257
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MELISSA LITTERAL (PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE)
People named in this filing
- MELISSA LITTERAL (PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE)
- SCOTT F STURGES (TREASURER AND TRUSTEE)
- JEAN E ATKIN (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary mission of the Ohio Jury Management Association (OJMA) was to promote and enhance jury service in Ohio through education and information. OJMA promoted professional education for jury commissioners, jury managers and judges. OJMA also developed jury information materials to educate jurors, potential jurors and the public. In addition, OJMA provided a forum for members and others to exchange ideas and information about jury management and jury service. Together with The Supreme Court of Ohio, Judicial College, OJMA conducted an annual educational conference for jury commissioners, jury managers, judges and court executives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational conference and programs, newsletter, jury legislation updates
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 21.3%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2008 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.