Ohio Indoor Performance Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261133109
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Toledo, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9374898711
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Performing Arts Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,257
- Expenses
- $45,257
- Assets
- $23,275
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAD CLUM (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHAD CLUM (PRESIDENT)
- DONNIE ROSS (AT LARGE)
- LAUREN HOLLOWAY (AT LARGE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Education
What it reported doing in 2020
The Ohio indoor performance association(oipa) is a non-profit organization that serves as a competitive performance circuit, governing body, and educational resource for student performers, insturctors and adjudicators throughout the state of Ohio. The performing idioms that the oipa offers include winter color guard, indoor drumline, baton and dance in both the individual and team setting. Through these experiences the oipa strives to foster a healthy competitive spirit, team work, a love of performing and a life long pursuit of excellence in the 34 member units, 21 guest units and over 600 students and instructors that the circuit serves. Offering competitive perfomances and educatonal events across the state of Ohio, the oipa strives to make the indoor pageantry arts available to performers and audience members in all areas of that state, ensuring that cost and travel concers never prevent interested individuals from participating in an oipa event. Additionally, the oipa offers competition classifications using criteria designed around every ability level, ensuring that students can experience success regardless of their experience and level of pageantry education. Since its formation, the oipa has been able to help provide its members with the support and resources necessary to be successful at local, state, regional and international pageantry evenets. The oipa is continually working with IRS membership to determine what new performance classifications, educational sessions and special events should be added to the circuit's services to best serve the members and creat the most positive performance and educational experience possible for the students, instructors and adjudicators involved. The oipa plans to continue to bring world-renowned adjudicators, clinicians, and performing ensembles to oipa events to best serve its members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.6%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.