Ohio Hills Health Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341192599
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Barnesville, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7404255165
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,603,925
- Expenses
- $8,640,679
- Assets
- $8,282,548
- Liabilities
- $3,435,200
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRAD HUDSON (PRESIDENT)
- LES TICKHILL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JEFF BRITTON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- HIMALAYA PATCHA MD (PHYSICIAN / MEDICAL DIRECT): $373,474 total reported compensation
- LAUREN WOOTEN MD (PHYSICIAN): $269,009 total reported compensation
- ROBERT BREWER DDS (DENTIST / DENTAL DIRECTOR): $253,447 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern Ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. The primary focus is to provide prompt, courteous and affordable health care that is responsive and sensitive to individual needs.Ohio hills health services is founded on the philosophy that the delivery of health care to the entire community and all its subgroups, including the medically indigent segment, is possible and practicable in a framework which does not separate subsets from total population and offers treatment regardless of economic status, race, national, geographic, or religious background, or political philosophy.in the exercise of delivering adequate health care to all segments of the patient population, appropriate standards and procedures must be enforced to protect the welfare of the patient.
What it reported doing in 2025
Providing medical care in underserved rural areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.8% of revenue deployed · 78.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $373K · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.