Ohio Association of Ambulatory Surgery Centers
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311678625
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6143580177
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $234,149
- Expenses
- $240,768
- Assets
- $136,814
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
People named in this filing
- ROGER ALBAN (CHAIR)
- SABRINA COEY (SECRETARY)
- NICOLE CRAMER (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Ohio association of ambulatory surgery centers is to enhance the quality of care in Ohio ambulatory surgery centers, provide legislative and regulatory representation for ambulatory surgery centers and to advocate their interests and those of their patients. The association promotes public awareness of ambulatory surgery centers, acts as spokesperson and representative to present the views of ambulatory surgery centers in appropriate forums. The association encourages high standards of professional conduct by organizations providing ambulatory surgical care and provides opportunities for members to enhance their ambulatory surgical care practices and methods. The association supports members in their expanding roles and responsibilties in meeting community health needs, promotes effectivess and efficiency through professional development, exchange of ideas and leadership. The association conducts and promotes education, research and collection of other information re
What it reported doing in 2025
The Ohio association of ambulatory surgical centers (oaasc) provides a variety of different workshops, conferences and other education opportunities to its members. These programs help to educate and assist member organizations in developing operational programs. Oaasc also provides members with information to enable their centers to operate using state-of-the-art surgical, technical and administrative procedures. Oaasc offers an annual multi-day conference, timely education offerings including in-person and web seminars and regular newsletters on reimbursement, regulatory compliance, quality standards, and other industry specific issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $241K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.