Ohio Assoc Cnty Behavioral Hlth Auth Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010762655
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6142241111
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,989,701
- Expenses
- $1,830,000
- Assets
- $2,087,585
- Liabilities
- $1,055,411
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELIZABETH A HENRICH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFCIER)
- CHRISTINA SHAYNAK-DIAZ (INTERIM CEO)
- CLIFFONDA G FREEMAN (INTERIM CEO)
- SCOTT SYLAK (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ELIZABETH A HENRICH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFCIER): $171,500 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINA SHAYNAK-DIAZ (INTERIM CEO): $150,142 total reported compensation
- CLIFFONDA G FREEMAN (INTERIM CEO): $111,580 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Ohio association of county behavioral health authorities foundation is a provider of educational and advocacy programs for quality, cost-effective prevention and treatment for behavioral health services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocacy programs: oacbha foundation in conjunction with community partners, developed and coordinated advocacy programs for client driven and culturally diverse services including health equity, mental health technology transfer center(mhttc), and appreciation events for first-responders. Oacbha foundation developed and coordinated trainings on crisis text hotline advocacy and outreach, opiate and other drug addiction best-practices, recovery supports, stigma reduction, health equity, self-care for first responders, and crisis academies, these programs were complted in-person and on virtual platforms.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 64% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 97.4%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 86.9%; rating input score 87; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.6% of revenue deployed · 97.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $172K · 15 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 23 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 35 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.