Ohio All-star Wrestling Team

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453648387
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Pickerington, OH, USA
Phone
6145071653
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports Competitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,916
Expenses
$116,305
Assets
$6,386

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BART FREIDENBERG (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BART FREIDENBERG (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Ohio all-star wrestling team's goal is to provide a good opportunity for participants to further their wrestling skills, especially in olympic or freestyle wrestling. Second, the organization will serve as a good cultural learning experience for all those involved. Not only will the team train hard for the scheduled matches, they will have the opportunity to view many sites of this great country of ours that they may never have a chance to view again. This tour will also serve as a good maturation process for the young men, as they will be on their own for six weeks and will need to learn a great number of life skills in the process. In addition, these individuals will have the opportunity to represent their state and promote not only the sport of wrestiling, but america's youth as well. They will be representing their hometown communities and schools. Wrestlers selected for this team are chosen not only on the basis of their athletic accomplishments, but on academic and civic achi

What it reported doing in 2018

Extensive training, travel, and competition at various locations in the united states.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.9%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 37.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.9% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.