Oglebay Park Golf Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550482776
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wheeling, WV, USA
Phone
3042810373
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,959
Expenses
$19,370
Assets
$65,438
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TC Chappelear (President)
  • Eric Stakem (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • TC Chappelear (President)
  • Eric Stakem (Vice President)
  • George Melnik (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The objects and purposes for which this corporation has been organized is to promote amateur golf and the proper ethics, sportsmanship, good fellowship of the game; to help improve the conditions for golf at Oglebay Park, to engage in various activities for the purpose of raising funds necessary to operate on a non-profit basis golf tournaments, golf events, and other related organized activities to make golf more pleasurable, recreational, and accessible to its members at Oglebay Park; to organize golf activities and programs to contribute to the general welfare of the young and the aged; to improve health and fitness through the game of golf; and to do and perform all activities of such corporations authorized by the laws of the State of West Virginia.

What it reported doing in 2025

Donation to Belmont Hills Jr golf for golf equipment. Donation to The Oglebay Foundation for golf equipment purchases. Donation to Bordas Charities based on funds raised at tournament.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.38; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.